Just months after narrowly skirting default, lawmakers in Washington are once again drawing battle lines over the budget.
Tl;dr: Goldman Sachs economists say a government shutdown this year looks "more likely than not." And hardline House Republicans are already warning they won't back a short-term spending bill unless they get major concessions that have zero chance of passing the Senate.
"The ingredients for a shutdown — a thin House majority, a dispute on spending levels and potential complications from various political issues — are present," they wrote in a report Sunday.
Congress isn't scheduled to return to Washington in full until the middle of next month. Government funding is slated to expire September 30. That's not a lot of time to hammer out a continuing resolution to keep the lights on.
To be sure, a government shutdown is a picnic compared with the financial armageddon that's expected if the US were to default on its debt. In a shutdown, federal workers would be furloughed, but the government would keep paying benefits like Social Security and, critically, interest and principal on US debt.
A shutdown would be "much more manageable from a macroeconomic perspective," the Goldman economists write.
That's good news and bad, my colleague Matt Egan writes.
The bad news is that because the economy can handle a shutdown, there's less pressure on politicians to reach a compromise.
BOTTOM LINE
A shutdown is largely an annoyance, but it's a symptom of deeper dysfunction that allowed the US to once again flirt with default earlier this year. The chaos wrought by GOP hardliners in the debt-ceiling fight was part of the reason Fitch Ratings decided to downgrade US debt earlier this month.
It's a messy unforced error at the heart of the US government.
And while financial markets were largely unfazed by the last federal shutdown in 2019, real people — including roughly 800,000 federal workers — missed a month's worth of pay.
Comments
Post a Comment