It's no secret that the CEO of your company is making bank. Getting a fat paycheck is, arguably, the only real benefit of being the boss.
But the gulf between a CEO's paycheck and their typical employee's has been widening for years, and the advent of AI — with its promise of automation and efficient problem-solving — is already threatening to exacerbate that gap.
See here: A new report from the AFL-CIO found that compensation among S&P 500 companies last year was $16.7 million — the second-highest level of executive pay ever. (2021 was the highest at $$18.3 million)
CEO pay actually fell last year compared to the previous year, said Brandon Rees, the AFL-CIO's deputy director of corporations and capital markets.
"However, it didn't fall nearly as much as stock prices fell, at which is the CEO's favorite yardstick for measuring their own performance...By any measure, CEO pay is still off the charts by historical measures."
(The S&P 500 fell by more than 18% in 2022, versus a decline of just 9% for the average CEO's pay package.)
But let's put that $16.7 million in context: Assuming a 45-year career at an average pay of $75,200, regular employees would need to work more than five lifetimes to make what the average CEO receives in a single year.
That is ... well, discouraging.
Meanwhile, US workers' real hourly wages fell in 2022 for the second year in a row by 1.6% after adjusting for inflation, the executive pay report found.
The bot battle
Among the biggest concerns raised in the pay report is the way AI is poised to benefit executives more than their employees. It's not hard to imagine it: Company X uses AI to become more efficient and profitable —probably by laying off or cutting the pay of humans who used to do those jobs — and investors reward the company by driving up its stock, lining the pockets of shareholders but not doing much for the average employee.
"The AI revolution has potential to unleash broad-based prosperity that improves working conditions and lifts us all up," said AFL-CIO Secretary-Treasurer Fred Redmond. "But if it's left unchecked, AI can increase economic inequality and undermined job security ... It doesn't have to be this way, and working people are starting to fight back," he said, noting how AI has become a central sticking point in the Hollywood strike.
It's not that the labor movement is anti-tech. It's just anti-tech-that-dehumanizes-work and anti-workers-not-having-a-say-in-how-tech-is-implemented.
"We really think that it's important that when companies tell us they can't afford it, or that it doesn't work for their business model, that we need to look at what they're doing with executive compensation and actually call them out for the inconsistency and hypocrisy that that reflects," said Duncan Crabtree-Ireland, the national executive director and chief negotiator for SAG-AFTRA. "Our members are rightly concerned about these big companies taking and owning their image, their likeness, digital replicas of them, and really replacing them as workers."
Comments
Post a Comment