Just three years ago, diversity and sustainability were big talking points for executives at many major companies and ESG funds — investments that evaluate stocks using environmental, social and governance factors — were riding the wave.
But corporate interest in trumpeting these initiatives appears to have been short-lived. Just 74 members of the S&P 500 even mentioned "ESG" in their first quarter earnings calls, according to new FactSet data.
That's the lowest number since the second quarter of 2020, when the police killing of George Floyd in May ushered in a new era of corporate social awareness.
What's happening: Mentions of "ESG'' peaked in the fourth quarter of 2021, when about 160 companies listed on the S&P 500 index brought up the term in their earnings calls. Since then, mentions have declined in four of the past five quarters.
Compared to the final three months of 2022, the number of S&P 500 companies citing "ESG" on earnings calls in the first quarter of 2023 has decreased by 23%.
ESG funds have also lost popularity with investors. Total assets under management in ESG funds fell by about $163.2 billion globally during the first quarter of 2023 from the year before, according to Lipper, a financial data provider.
It's not that the funds are underperforming, either. The average overall return for these funds was 2.2% in March — outperforming the 12-month moving average return for the wider market by 2.8 percentage points.
Instead, a confluence of political, geopolitical and market events has severely damaged interest in ESG investing.
The rise of green hushing: Russia's ongoing war in Ukraine forced traders to reconsider investing in energy and weapons stocks. And increased scrutiny by elected leaders in the United States played into political differences around ESG investing and opened the door to vocal critics.
Because of a partisan divide, about half of US states are enacting provisions to block efforts to invest in state-run investment accounts with an ESG lens, Lipper found.
What's followed is a growing conservative backlash against corporate social and environmental initiatives.
Angry campaigns from conservative groups against LGBTQ-inclusive programming from AB InBev led to real drops in revenue for the company. Bud Light lost its place as the top-selling beer in America this week following backlash over a social media promotion with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney.
A recent Wall Street Journal column erroneously suggested that the recent collapse of Silicon Valley Bank was caused in part by the bank's focus on diversity and inclusivity and Republican Congressman Mike Collins of Georgia blamed diversity initiatives for the Norfolk Southern train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio. The Congressman asked whether the company's diversity initiatives were "directing resources away from the important things like greasing wheel bearings?"
Companies "see that certain terms have become lightning rod terms. ESG is one of them," said Douglas Chia, president of Soundboard Governance and former executive director of the Conference Board's ESG Center.
Firms looking to avoid the controversy are dialing back rhetoric that shows their enthusiasm for ESG programs, said Chia. But even though they aren't talking about them publicly, they're still continuing on with these initiatives, he added.
All walk, no talk: Major corporations are actively preparing for soon-to-be climate disclosure requirements from the Securities and Exchange Commission and the largest financial institutions in the US have all voluntarily participated in a climate change stress test designed by the Federal Reserve.
About 70% of US CEOs said last October that their ESG programs improved their financial performance. That's up from 37% last year, according to a KPMG report.
"I don't think internally it means that there is less of a commitment. It's just that externally companies don't want to be as vocal about these initiatives for now," said Chia. "I think when some of this dies down after the 2024 elections, companies might dial it back up."
It's not all politics, either. David Duffy, CEO and co-founder of the Corporate Governance Institute, says that companies are also pulling back because they're afraid they'll be called out for a lack of substance to their claims of creating a more inclusive workplace.
"You can say you're increasing diversity initiatives just for the optics, but without data to back it up, you'll eventually get called out by stakeholders," he said.
Comments
Post a Comment